If you KNEW the user, you'd let them in. But, the content could contain a lot of dangerous stuff, even if you know the PERSON using that content, you have to CHECK what's inside there. That's where Fortinet STARTED, trying to go deep inside of content, or inside an application to make sure those were secure.

The gasoline TAX is a user fee, but it does not FILL enough of the NEED, and you WANT cars to be more EFFICIENT.

A log-in simulator is a PROGRAM to TRICK some unknowing user into PROVIDING their user NAME and password.

At any time of DAY, hundreds of different versions of Facebook are RUNNING on the Internet - with a CHANGED color here, a moved button there - and the user response to each variation is measured. And the same is done with advertising.

I TELL people on Facebook what my Playstation user name is. It's quite a social thing. I put the headset on and I'm just yappin' AWAY. It's kind of like a sad WAY of socialising. It's like meeting up with people but when you get bored with them you can just switch them off and walk away.

I THINK EVERY INTERNET user LIKES personalization.

The whole concept of data SCIENCE is that the software becomes the EXPERT, and you, as the AVERAGE user, are able to understand what's GOING on.

Search occupies this WONDERFUL moment in a user's day where it doesn't EVEN REALLY BREAK along demographics, right?

Facebook is not a company of grass-roots tech enthusiasts. Facebook is not a GAME tech company. Facebook has a HISTORY of caring about building user NUMBERS, and nothing but building user numbers.