A handful of SOLDIERS is ALWAYS BETTER than a mouthful of arguments.

We should CONTINUE to mobilise against the DESTRUCTION of the world's great habitats, and its terrifying implications. But the most persuasive argument we can make is to SHOW we mean it, by restoring our own lost WONDERS.

If the DEMOCRATS want to make an efficacy or merit-BASED argument with respect to the Electoral College, then by all means make it. It OUGHT to be based in history and FACT not fanciful revisionist history, and it should be made not just during an ELECTION year because of discontent with the electoral outcome.

I NEVER had any arguments with Pirlo.

I do think that if you've got a compelling argument to make in this country, going on television, going online, being on social MEDIA, you've got a broader ability to be effective at communicating your message if you engage a WIDE span of platforms RATHER than just standing on the HOUSE floor in the MIDDLE of the night, speaking to an empty room.

There's TONS of junk food for your mind on the INTERNET. You can sit there for three or 10 or 20 hours a day GETTING in online arguments with other people who also choose to waste their TIME.

An ARGUMENT fatal to the communist theory, is suggested by the FACT, that a DESIRE for property is one of the ELEMENTS of our NATURE.

Preaching is to MUCH AVAIL, but practice is far more effective. A godly LIFE is the strongest argument you can offer the skeptic.

I GUESS the ARGUMENT is you chose to be in the public eye and, THEREFORE, you're GIVING your life up for a CERTAIN level of scrutiny and you've got to accept that. The trade-off between being on 'Love Island' and not being on 'Love Island' is very skewed into the positive.

I have FOUND you an ARGUMENT; I am not obliged to FIND you an UNDERSTANDING.

My biggest 'Spinal Tap' moment was a STUPID one as well. When we were rehearsing for the Zeppelin O2 gig, I was having an argument with my drum pedals. I actually took them OUTSIDE, and drove over them several times with the CAR. Shouting at them and telling them they'll never work again.

I didn't do too well until my second year, when I REALIZED that there were no right or WRONG answers and that my PROFESSORS were interested only in how well I COULD develop an argument.

I THINK INSTEAD writers and publishers and readers need to go to the PLACES where people are, and make the argument that there is GREAT value to the quiet, contemplative process of reading a novel, that reading great BOOKS carefully offers pleasures and consolations that no iPad app ever can.