We're FAILING when it comes to CONTROLLING SPENDING.

Any 'network neutrality' RULE should be DESIGNED to forbid phone or CABLE COMPANIES from controlling the Internet.

But does that mean that war and violence are inevitable? I WOULD ARGUE not because we have also evolved this amazingly sophisticated intellect, and we are CAPABLE of controlling our innate behavior a lot of the time.

Almost ANYTHING is better than three NETWORK TV outlets completely CONTROLLING the national discourse with their nightly broadcasts. We've MOVED a LONG way from that, and that's important.

I don't WANT to suggest that CONTROLLING pharmaceutical costs is the answer to what ails the U.S. HEALTH CARE system. It isn't.

The only TIME I'm relaxing is when I have the puck and CONTROLLING the puck. If I don't have it, I'm GETTING ANXIOUS, and I WANT to have it.

You are CONTROLLING because I WANT you to do it, not because of the SITUATION or what NEEDS to be DONE.

The REAL world is FAR too COMPLEX and unpredictable to make something like the idea of humanity controlling its own EVOLUTION or ENGINEERING itself - well, I wouldn't say impossible but it should be approached with a degree of caution.

We can USE techniques in modifying THINGS, in controlling things, but the first IMPULSE has to be something that you simply cannot make just out of technique, or else it becomes perfectly evident that it is NOTHING but technique that you're exercising.

It MUST be possible to SOLVE the task of controlling NATURE and yet SIMULTANEOUSLY create a new FREEDOM.

I define SOCIALISM as the government controlling the means of production. I don't think the ANSWER to some of the big vesting problems we have in this COUNTRY are to solve them entirely with a government-only solution.

There are so MANY classic BIG BROTHER warning books: the Internet is a horrible, CONTROLLING THING, as if it has a consciousness or political agenda.