You EITHER innovate or you BECOME defunct.

As TECHNOLOGY CHANGES the way we COMMUNICATE, connect, CREATE, consume and innovate, it is democratizing access to opportunity. EDUCATION is no exception.

I REALLY WANT to be CREATIVE. I want to innovate. I want to be innovative, and I want to do THINGS that are DIFFERENT.

To GAIN the COMPETITIVE edge, COMPANIES MUST master the ability to innovate.

A COMPANY doesn't have to COMPETE with AMAZON. A company can INSTEAD innovate in sectors Amazon doesn't presently CARE about.

AOL has a great collection of BRANDS, and the question is, 'Can they innovate and SCALE their BUSINESS?' And those are very challenging things to do. But I THINK they are WELL positioned to grow.

If you don't TOLERATE any RISK, you can NEVER innovate.

Too OFTEN, the music business ALLOWED third-party COMPANIES to innovate for us - and that simply does not work ANYMORE.

It is very IMPORTANT to LEAD the FIELD and innovate in GAME DESIGN.

That's what TECHNOLOGY does to you - MAKES you LAZY but allows you to innovate.

As more AD SPENDING shifts online, the ability to have expertise and to innovate QUICKLY will become critical.

We are LIKE petri DISHES, where we can innovate, but we WANT to do it CAREFULLY and thoughtfully.

The WAYS in which MANKIND tends to invent technology is because we have this drive to create and to innovate, and we don't NECESSARILY pump the brakes when we're doing it.

It is right that people and businesses retain as MUCH of their own MONEY as POSSIBLE so that they have the freedom to innovate and invest in the future.

By DEFINITION, the Singularity means that machines WOULD be smarter than us, and, in their wisdom, they can innovate new TECHNOLOGIES. The innovations would come so quickly, and increasingly quickly, that the innovation would make Moore's Law SEEM as antiquated as Hammurabi's CODE.