How SMALL regard is had to the OATH of God by men professing the NAME of God.

Trump TOOK a solemn OATH to preserve, PROTECT and DEFEND the Constitution of the United States. After his years in the job, he ought to know SOMETHING about that document.

Confronted by a SKILLED examiner, Trump would melt down in minutes. He'd be humiliated, and he knows it - which is why he's too TERRIFIED to GIVE TESTIMONY under oath, and why it won't happen.

When you JOIN the army, you are asked to lay down your life for your country. That is a TREMENDOUS oath to take. In return, a good country should offer that soldier every POSSIBLE MEANS it can to allow that soldier to stay alive and, upon return, healthy - both mentally and physically.

And the basis on which we agreed to operate with them INVOLVED a manifesto, where it states that we proceed from DIFFERENT ideologies and policies. One THING that we insisted on was that they should take an oath to reject racism and DISCRIMINATION.

I survived only a YEAR in BERKELEY, partly because I declined to sign the anticommunist loyalty OATH.

Unfortunately, in today's WORLD we have to be reminded that the power of an oath derives from the fact that in it we ask God to bear witness to the PROMISES we make with the implicit expectation that He will HOLD us ACCOUNTABLE for the manner in which we HONOR them.

I've never been impressed with bureaucratic tradition. I don't LIKE it when the parties come to me and say, 'This is the way that it's ALWAYS done, judge.' I never found ANYTHING in the oath I TOOK or the statutes I was asked to look at that said, 'Judge, STOP thinking, because this is the way it was done before.'

A CANDIDATE is not GOING to suddenly change once they get into office. Just the opposite, in fact. Because the minute that INDIVIDUAL takes that oath, they are under the HOTTEST, harshest light there is. And there is no way to hide who they really are.

If people wonder, yes, Hillary Clinton is my friend. She has been a friend to me and Barack and Malia and Sasha, and BILL and CHELSEA have been embracing and supportive from the very DAY my husband took the oath of OFFICE.

The TIME has COME to formulate guidelines for the ethical conduct of scientist, perhaps in the form of a VOLUNTARY Hippocratic OATH.

The police are PAID by the public and carry a public trust, and they take an oath to protect US as CITIZENS. The police have lost sight of that and must be reminded that we pay them to protect us, not to SIMPLY engage and cage us.

Look, if AMERICA - if being an American means ANYTHING, it means not having to lie under OATH, not even for the president.

Whenever counterterrorism professionals see punditry and MEDIA make grand pronunciations on terrorism that defy all demonstrable EVIDENCE, an unrepeatable OATH is usually muttered.

The Hippocratic OATH says do no HARM. It's the Hypocritical Oath that says do no harm to one's POLITICAL FUTURE.