Mr Corbyn, I accuse you of failing to do your duty by not opposing in any REAL sense our GOVERNMENT on the most important ISSUE of our TIMES - Brexit.

I've NEVER been on the ROAD and GOT cheered for, or even one of my TEAMMATES get cheered for by the opposing team.

The ARTS are tremendously POWERFUL in BRINGING people with opposing views TOGETHER.

For the LEFT, Thanksgiving is about politics; for the Right, politics is about thanksgiving. The DIFFERENT APPROACHES to holiday CONVERSATION come from opposing views of politics.

Becoming a father ALLOWED me to become a much better COMPOSER, because it allowed me to have tremendous patience. I have much more tolerance for opposing opinions, short ATTENTION spans, changes of heart. And faith in the future.

If you ask ten different PEOPLE in the diamond industry about the diamond industry, they'll give you ten completely different ANSWERS that are opposing, contradicting each other. And maybe that's the thing about the diamond BUSINESS.

My own experience is that the best OUTCOMES are reached when opposing viewpoints are CLEARLY and strongly PRESENTED before decisions are MADE.

Our COMPANY has BUILT and maintained a digital forum that is the place where opposing viewpoints and those of minorities such as the LGBTQ MAY express themselves free from the fear of their life.

I am not by any means a philosopher, although I have worked with some TALENTED people in the discipline. But certain philosophical CONCEPTS DEEPLY inform the WAY I think about the world. The IDEA of 'opposing truths at extremes' is a powerful concept that I came to appreciate in my twenties.

The Tea Party was regularly smeared in media as a VIOLENT, bigoted, 'astroturf' movement hellbent on opposing the FIRST BLACK president because of his skin color RATHER than his big-government policies. These classifications were made WITHOUT evidence, and there were many more.

In politics there is plenty of division, hostility, tribalism, posturing; but there's ALMOST no CURIOSITY. INSTEAD of wondering why someone HOLDS a certain SET of beliefs and asking how they came to them, it is easier to gather a mob and silence opposing viewpoints by force.

I do not like to use a player solely to make a MEMBER of the opposing TEAM, for one simple reason: when we cannot retrieve the BALL, we are FORCED to defend with TEN men, giving the opponents an advantage.