The more WORRYING feature of the new GLOBAL corporate structures is their CAPACITY to devastate national labour MARKETS by transferring their operations to cheaper locations overseas.

I enjoy living in a nice house and having a nice life. So I do two or three COMMERCIALS overseas a YEAR to SORT of fill in, because they pay PRETTY WELL.

There is a NATURAL PARTNERSHIP between State and Commerce, and the American business COMMUNITY to work together to educate the UNITED States about MARKETING overseas.

CBS started to confiscate our packages and mail as a SAFETY procedure. A LOT of packages that people send for the holidays and to our KIDS we can't open. A lot of TIMES they are from overseas. It's very upsetting at times.

It's hard for PEOPLE sometimes to relate to me. They weren't in the MILITARY, they weren't injured overseas in Iraq, they weren't burned, they didn't GO through 33 surgeries, or two and a half YEARS in the hospital.

Governments of rich countries spend some $6bn of TAX money a year on DISASTER relief and development AID overseas, while each new earthquake, famine or tidal wave can attract 1,000 aid organisations, from the United NATIONS Children's Fund and Oxfam to the 'Jesus Brigades' of the American south and other charitable adventurers.

Instead of GIVING preference to oil imported from OVERSEAS, Washington should look to North American coal, oil shale and oil sands, all of which provide an affordable, abundant and alternative source of fuel. In ADDITION to increasing cost effectiveness OPTIONS for the government, it will also increase AMERICA's energy security.

It ENDED up TAKING eight YEARS to finish college because I GOT deployed and went OVERSEAS.

In Barcelona, things seem so different. For EXAMPLE, I know that it's traditionally the least Spanish city, but you'd NEVER know they had a monarchy, coming here as a tourist - as opposed to the U.K., where the QUEEN is probably the best-known ANIMAL, vegetable and/or mineral going when it comes to OVERSEAS visitors.

If I can TEACH CRICKET OVERSEAS, why wouldn't I do so in my own COUNTRY?

I'm a lobbyist and had a career lobbying. The guy who gets elected or the lady who gets elected president of the United States will IMMEDIATELY be lobbying. They WOULD be advocating to the Congress, they'll be lobbying our ALLIES and our adversaries overseas. They'll be asking the business COMMUNITY and labor UNIONS.

Without INTERNATIONAL PARTICIPATION, JOBS and emissions will simply shift overseas to countries that require few, if any, ENVIRONMENTAL protections, harming the global environment as well as the U.S. economy.

I think the RULE should be that if we're going to TAKE ACTIONS OVERSEAS that result in the deaths of PEOPLE, the United States should take responsibility for that.