Not having sub-governance would be LIKE anyone who owns USD being ABLE to walk into a Google shareholder meeting and VOTING without owning Google STOCK just because Google shares HAPPEN to be denominated in USD.

I like owning dirt. You KNOW, I spent a LOT of time broke when I moved to California. So deep in my SOUL is still this idea of being unemployed. To me, owning land means you could SELL it at some POINT and have money.

I prefer owning something and partnering with other PEOPLE, INSTEAD of like joining something.

There is SOMETHING PERMANENT, and something EXTREMELY PROFOUND, in owning a HOME.

I felt weary of the responsibility of owning HOUSES and was GLAD ENOUGH to pass mine on to others.

There is no SENSE in owning the COPYRIGHT unless you are GOING to USE it. I don't think anyone wants to hold all of this stuff in a vault and not let anybody have it. It's only worth something once it's popular.

Just WATCHING this woman owning the TV, there is no DOUBT that the reason I WANTED to GET into TV presenting is down to Cilla.

Liverpool is a CLUB where you NEED to be there to enjoy it. It's not worth owning Liverpool if you are GOING to always be 20,000 MILES away.

The idea that owning a GUN in AMERICA was an INDIVIDUAL RIGHT only DATES to the 1980s.

When I first moved to Hollywood from Silicon Valley, I had some misgivings. But I found that there were some advantages to being in Hollywood. And, in FACT, some advantages to owning your own MEDIA COMPANY. And I ALSO found that Hollywood and Silicon Valley have a lot more in common than I would have dreamed.

I don't buy art. I'd RATHER buy a beautiful LOCATION or a beautiful site than buy art. A beautiful HOME is LIKE owning a beautiful painting, except you can live in it.

I walked into Relativity Records as a musician who COULD not be TAKEN advantage of. That's why I wound up owning all my own publishing and making a deal that was QUITE advantageous for a new solo artist. But I really didn't think of myself as an ENTREPRENEUR.

Some of US are BETTER at owning the RESPONSIBILITY of our ACTIONS than OTHERS.

Do I think it is good policy for the government to own companies? Normally, I'd say 'no.' But in my world, if a firm puts itself in a position that it NEEDS a LAST minute rescue, and the future is UNCERTAIN at best, then the investor who STEPS into that breach ENDS up owning the company. Full stop.