I think I have some ADVICE for both the TALENT, and the 'powers that be' in professional wrestling. I would say let the guys say it their own WAY and let them put their own matches TOGETHER.
The TRUTH is that it was local councils who asked for the power and the freedom to try different ways of encouraging residents to reduce the AMOUNT they throw WAYAWAY, and it was Labour that gave them these POWERS.
I will to my dying day oppose, with all the powers and faculties GOD has GIVEN me, all such instruments of SLAVERY on the one hand and villainy on the other as this Writ of Assistance is.
If a radical devolution of powers was possible, it would have been done before. The ASSUMPTION of states' RIGHTS is gone. There's no support for it in the SUPREMECOURT and there's no support for it in public opinion.
You can base your life in fear or you can base your life in love. Fear LEADS to negative results even in times that are basically good. On the other HAND, love POWERS the UNIVERSE.
Science has produced such powerful weapons that in a WAR between great POWERS there would be NEITHER victor nor vanquished. Both would be overwhelmed in destruction.
Such HAPPINESS as life is CAPABLE of comes from the full PARTICIPATION of all our powers in the endeavor to wrest from each CHANGING situations of experience its own full and unique MEANING.
The disruptive POWERS of excessive national fecundity MAY have played a greater part in bursting the bonds of convention than EITHER the power of IDEAS or the errors of autocracy.
People should not EXPECT the state to PROTECT them from fraudsters. If we do, we get into the HABIT of neglecting our own powers of intellectual discernment.
Don't like flag-burning? Fine. HATE flag-burning? Me too! The thing is, THOUGH, hating something doesn't always MEAN that the answer is to call on government POWERS to ban it - and, in fact, I'd say that that is rarely the best solution, especially when it comes to speech.