I believe the mobile OS market will play out very similarly to Windows and Macintosh, with Android in the ROLE of Windows. And so, if you want to be in FRONT of the largest number of users, you need to be on Android.

The challenge is when you're offered SIMILAR ROLES, and you have to play them differently. I don't want people to SAY, 'She performs similarly in every FILM. There is no versatility.'

I remember at 16 years old, growing up in QUEENS, we were punks, but hey, when we went to the THEATER, we wore a shirt and tie! Similarly, I believe that to keep MOVIE theaters in existence, they're gonna have to make 'em an event, have a couch, a table and drinks or something. OTHERWISE, there's no reason to GET out of your bed!

It's RUNS for batsmen which is the criteria for SELECTION and similarly, it is wickets for bowlers which are IMPORTANT.

I BELIEVE that there is a simple demand and supply RULE that works on television. While MANY are hooked on web SERIES, some enjoy non-fiction. Similarly, there are people who love watching SUPERNATURAL genre.

I'm a designer, but I rely on PROGRAMMERS to bring my ideas to life. By learning to code myself, I think I can make things easier for all of US. Similarly, I WANT to be able to BUILD things on my own without having to bother a PROGRAMMER.

A good role is one that MOVES ALONG with the STORY, like 'Baazigar' and 'Kareeb' for EXAMPLE. Similarly, I agreed to '36 China Town' and 'Phir Hera Pheri' because my characters in both films have a graph and are SIGNIFICANT in moving the story ahead.

I KIND of APPROACH action/non-action very MUCH similarly. It has to be character-based and it has to kind of COME off the THEME and the overall arc.

For my film 'FASHION,' like an investigative journalist, I went about KNOWING the people, the MODELS, the fashion DESIGNERS. Similarly with the corporate world.