There is no sense in making STATEMENTS that will not CONTINUE to be true after they are MADE.
Read MoreWhen SOMEBODY SAYS that all STATEMENTS are FALSE, the obvious problem is that as an assertion it's self-defeating.
Read MoreChroniclers of the role of paper in HISTORY are given to extravagant pronouncements: Architecture WOULD not have been POSSIBLE without paper. Without paper, there would have been no RENAISSANCE. If there had been no paper, the Industrial Revolution would not have been possible. None of these statements is TRUE.
Read MoreWell, they had a lot of the things they found in his possession. They had the map, you KNOW, that MARKED the route of the PARADE. They had STATEMENTS from the bus driver and the taxicab driver that hauled him somewhere.
Read MoreI do not agree with the use of 'signing STATEMENTS' to effectively act as a line-item VETO, except when the President BELIEVES a law or a provision WITHIN a law is unconstitutional.In general, if a President signs a law, they are committing themselves to enforcing it. If they don't believe it should BECOME a law, they should veto it.
Read MoreI think that's the PLACE ideally we'd like to get to as well, as QUEER PEOPLE, where you can just JUDGE the music for what it is and not just because it's GAY. I think it's important that until we get to that place, statements have to be made, and we have to be loud and outward, so that's where I'm coming from.
Read More