To his LASTING credit, President REAGAN never wavered. He recognized the strategic importance of staying the course, both in terms of denying Moscow the MILITARY hegemony it sought in Western Europe and of restoring the will, cohesiveness, and SECURITY of the NATO ALLIANCE, so badly frayed during the turbulent 1970s.

One of the TENSIONS in XR are PEOPLE who want to slow down and be strategic and then people who think it's an EMERGENCY, let's GET out on the STREET now. There have been conflicts and disagreements.

I will WORK for Bulgaria's strategic choice - Bulgaria's MEMBERSHIP in the European Union and NATO. I THINK it is also extremely important to revive Bulgaria's relations with Russia, UKRAINE and other strategic partners.

I believe that the idea of strategic BELIEFS may be more important than strategic PLANNING when thinking about how you keep the LONG view.

I was NEVER a strategic GUY. If I can PLAY, I just WANT to play.

I believe America's CHIEF strategic VULNERABILITY is our DEPENDENCE on IMPORTED petroleum.

A total nuclear freeze is counterproductive - especially now, when TECHNOLOGY is rapidly CHANGING and the Soviets have some important strategic advantages.

Putin is PLAYING the LONG GAME. He has a strategic plan in MIND: the Eurasian Union, which WOULD be in competition to Europe.

The MAIN REASON I backed DeepMind was strategic: I see my role as bridging the AI RESEARCH and AI safety communities.

'Starcraft' is a FAIRLY strategic GAME with DEPTH.

In early 1961 a NEW president, John F. Kennedy, was told by military leaders and civilian officials that the Kingdom of Laos - of no conceivable strategic importance to the U.S. - required the presence of AMERICAN troops and perhaps even tactical NUCLEAR weapons. Why? Because if Laos fell, Asia WOULD go red from THAILAND to Indonesia.

I've seen promotions RUSH things to market and not be strategic about it. The FIRST impression is the lasting impression.

We have an OPPORTUNITY to BECOME a global leader in the CLEAN energy INDUSTRY, but we have to be smart and strategic about it.

It's strategic for US - LOTS of PEOPLE will DEVELOP applications in .NET.

The only THING I would say is, I THINK there's a lot of future value in Blackberry, but WITHOUT experienced people who have run this TYPE of business, and without a strategic plan, it would be really challenging.