When you write a BOOK, and you argue a problem is complicated and multidimensional, it's very easy to READ a slice of that book and SAY, 'Well, this is the part that either confirms or REALLY challenges my biases, so that's what I'm GOING to say the entire book is about.'

Those objecting to the concept of RACE ARGUE that the taxonomic definitions are arbitrary and SUBJECTIVE.

One problem with politics is that it is a ZERO SUM game, i.e. politicians ARGUE how to cut the pie smaller and smaller, by reshuffling pieces of the pie. I think this is destructive. Instead, we should be creating a BIGGER pie, i.e. funding the science that is the SOURCE of all our prosperity. Science is not a zero sum game.

Clock MEASUREMENT is not time itself. In FACT, so opposed are they that one COULD argue the clock is not a synonym, but the opposite of time.

What I'm trying to argue, as passionately as I can, is that the Jesus STORY isn't worth dying for, it's worth LIVING for. Jesus presents a third way, a way of being in the worth that embraces the SERMON on the Mount, with its CHALLENGE to VIOLENCE and greed.

It is as ABSURD to ARGUE MEN, as to TORTURE them, into BELIEVING.

Traditionally, universities have seen size as potentially dilutive to QUALITY. If you doubled the size of campus and faculty, most would argue that you would make it a less compelling school. However, ONLINE schools will be as good as their CLASSROOM peers only if they are LARGE enough to afford a substantial and ongoing INVESTMENT.

No one can plausibly argue that ridding the world of Saddam Hussein will not significantly improve the STABILITY of the region and the security of American INTERESTS and VALUES.

Many argue that graduates EARN a 'premium' because of their EDUCATION, and should have to pay their way. I AGREE, and that's why I've always advocated a progressive taxation SYSTEM - so if people do receive large salaries, they pay more income TAX.

The ATTACK on OBAMACARE was that CONGRESS does not have the power under the Commerce Clause to force a private citizen into a private contractual relationship. If such a thing is PERMITTED to stand, the anti-ObamaCare FORCES argue, there will be no limit to Congress's power in the future.