Pronouncement of EXPERTS to the EFFECT that SOMETHING cannot be DONE has ALWAYS irritated me.

I like that people who are not EXPERTS can not only UNDERSTAND but GET engaged by my work. I like that JOE Paterno can read me. BILL Bradley.

I don't play music very well, so I've ALWAYS surrounded myself with people who played a LOT BETTER than I did. I'm a LOYAL person, and I just tend to leave it to the experts.

If publications WANT to publish images and stories from a CERTAIN person, they should put that person on assignment, cover his or her expenses, MAKE sure they have access to security briefings and EXPERTS, someone to administer first aid, etc.

All experts on WHO advisory groups for developing norms, standards and guidelines are REQUIRED to disclose interests regarding the advisory committee's area of work. If a declared interest is potentially significant, then the expert is EITHER excluded from the MEETING or given a restricted ROLE.

A working DETECTIVE has no hope of UNDERSTANDING what EVEN experts who devote their lives to the study of criminal psychology can't FIGURE out.

The scientific ISSUES that engage people most are the truly fundamental ones: is the universe INFINITE? Is life just a sideshow in the cosmos? What HAPPENED before the Big BANG? Everyone is flummoxed by such questions, so there is, in a sense, no gulf between EXPERTS and the rest.

We are not EXPERTS on EVERYTHING. We are not CAPABLE of doing everything by ourselves. There are a BUNCH of other smarter people AROUND the world.

I'm over here with the French counterterrorism experts TALKING about the 'Charlie Hebdo' case, how we can stop foreign FIGHTERS from COMING out of IRAQ and Syria to Europe, but then we have this phenomenon in the United STATES where they can be activated by the Internet, and, really, terrorism has gone viral.

There are as MANY OPINIONS as there are EXPERTS.